On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette <r...@tristatelogic.com> wrote: > After a careful investigation, I am of the opinion that each of the > following 18 ASNs was registered (via RIPE) with fradulent information > purporting to represent the identity of the true registrant, and that > in fact, all 18 of these ASNs were registered by a single party, > apparently as part of a larger scheme to provide IP space to various > snowshoe spammers.
Ronald, What is your goal here? Is there some action that any particular NANOG participant should take based on your opinion? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
