<SNIP HEADERS> > > > This is a misleading statement. ISP's (Common carriers) do not provide a > knowingly > > illegal offering, ... TOR exit/entrance nodes provide only the former. > > This is also a misleading statement. Explain the difference between > a consumer ISP selling you a cable Internet plan knowing that NN% of > the traffic will be data with questionable copyright status, and > 1 of of 5 or so will be a botted box doing other illegal stuff, > and a TOR node providing transit knowing that NN% will be similarly > questionable etc etc etc.
You actually are saying what I said, just you misunderstand your own point. You clipped my entire statement to make it appear to say something else. A TOR node, in and of itself, is not infrastructure for passing packets. It's a service on the infrastructure. I never implied that the traffic through/from the ISP or the TOR was more or less legal than the other. > > In other words, if TOR exit nodes provide a "knowingly illegal offering", > then Comcast is doing exactly the same thing... No they are not. See previous. <SNIP ongoing blathering> - Brian
