I seriously doubt many TOR exit nodes have the political clout to be considered a common carrier. In a related note, I wonder if the six-strike rule would violate the ISP's safe harbor, as it's clearly content inspection. Nick
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Jordan Michaels <jor...@viviotech.net>wrote: > On 12/03/2012 03:31 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 08:49:24AM +0000, Warren Bailey wrote: >> >>> Can you imagine an email thread that lasted longer than an entire >>> weekend? >>> >> >> Yes, I can. I've participated in some that went on for months. It's >> simply >> a matter of effectiveness and attention span. >> >> This email needs to be murdered, because it is completely out of control. >>> >> >> I disagree, strongly, as this is an issue of unfortunate timely >> relevance to the community. >> > > +1 I strongly disagree as well. I am very interested to see how this case > evolves in and out of court. Are Tor exit-node operators going to be given > the same rights as ISP's who's networks are used for illegal purposes? I > would hope so, but it doesn't seem like that has happened in this case, so > I am very interested to hear how the situation pans out. > > It is extremely relevant to the Internet community and to free speech in > general. > > Kind regards, > Jordan Michaels > Vivio Technologies > >
