Just a friendly reminder that the RFP for NANOG 57 is approaching in just over 
two weeks.

Best Regards,
-Dave Temkin

On Nov 8, 2012, at 11:48 AM, David Temkin <d...@temk.in> wrote:

> NANOG Community,
> 
> I know that we all just left Dallas after NANOG 56, but the NANOG Program 
> Committee is already hard at work preparing for NANOG 57 in Orlando!  
> 
> The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold their 57th 
> meeting in Orlando, FL on February 4th through the 6th.  Of special note, 
> this is the first meeting that will have a fully Monday through Wednesday 
> agenda.  Our host, CyrusOne is eagerly awaiting welcoming you to the 
> Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld.
> 
> The NANOG Program Committee is now seeking proposals for presentations, 
> panels, tutorials, tracks sessions, and keynote materials for the NANOG 57 
> program. We invite presentations highlighting issues relating to technology 
> already deployed or soon-to-be deployed in the Internet. Vendors are 
> encouraged to work with operators to present real-world deployment 
> experiences with the vendor's products and interoperability. NANOG 57 
> submissions are welcome at  http://pc.nanog.org  
> 
> For further information on what the Program Committee is seeking, please see 
> http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/callforpresentations.html
> 
> This will also be our first meeting after the 2012 WCIT in early December, 
> and we expect topical and timely presentations regarding the results
> 
>     When considering submitting a presentation,  keep these important dates 
> in mind: 
> 
>     Presentation Abstracts and Draft Slides Due:  10-December-2012
>     Final Slides Due:                                                     
> 7-January-2013
>     Draft Program Published:                                    
> 14-January-2013 
>     Final Agenda Published:                                     
> 18-January-2013 
> 
>     Please submit your materials to http://pc.nanog.org 
> 
> Looking forward to seeing everyone in Orlando! 
> 
> -Dave Temkin

Reply via email to