Or artificially high ... On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a > number > of reasons. > > Owen > > On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Aaron Toponce <aaron.topo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Tomas Podermanski wrote: >>> It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first >>> time when native IPv6 on google statistics >>> (http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some >>> might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-) >> >> And given the rate on that graph, we'll hit 2% before year-end 2013. >> >> -- >> . o . o . o . . o o . . . o . >> . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o >> o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o > >
-- Ray Patrick Soucy Network Engineer University of Maine System T: 207-561-3526 F: 207-561-3531 MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network www.maineren.net
