Wait!
Are you suggesting to not use it as intended by RFC6598?
"to
be used as Shared Address Space to accommodate the needs of Carrier-
Grade NAT (CGN) devices. It is anticipated that Service Providers
will use this Shared Address Space to number the interfaces that
connect CGN devices to Customer Premises Equipment (CPE)"
:)
.as
On 18/10/2012 13:25, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Majdi S. Abbas <m...@latt.net> wrote:
>
>> RFCs are just paper. As for why they use it.. the common private
>> use reserved blocks (10/8, 172.16/12, 192.168/16) are all in use
>> internally in their customers networks. This is probably the easiest
>> way to avoid addressing conflicts.
>>
>
> but, but, but!! we have that nifty new '1918' space... 100.64.0.0/10
>
> :)
>
