>> ok. i'll bite. what the heck is this meant to support? i thought the >> rirs were moving from five TALs to one. > > Randy, we have an operational need to separate the existing single TAL > into its discrete components for each source, so we can have production > certificates for each source, so that we can ultimately have them signed > under their appropriate parent registry,
ok, i'll give. what are the five 'sources'? randy
