>> ok.  i'll bite.  what the heck is this meant to support?  i thought the
>> rirs were moving from five TALs to one.
> 
> Randy, we have an operational need to separate the existing single TAL
> into its discrete components for each source, so we can have production 
> certificates for each source, so that we can ultimately have them signed
> under their appropriate parent registry,

ok, i'll give.  what are the five 'sources'?

randy

Reply via email to