On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Blake Dunlap <iki...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is not the proper way to interpret traceroute information. Also, 3 > pings is not sufficient to determine levels of packet loss statistically. > > I suggest searching the archives regarding traceroute, or googling how to > interpret them in regards to packet loss, as what you posted does not > indicate what you think it does.
Agreed. Derek should read "A Practical Guide to (Correctly) Troubleshooting with Traceroute": http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog45/presentations/Sunday/RAS_traceroute_N45.pdf -- Darius Jahandarie
