Subject: Re: Big Temporary Networks Date: Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:40:02AM -0400 Quoting Jay Ashworth (j...@baylink.com): > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Måns Nilsson" <mansa...@besserwisser.org> > > > 12:20:33AM -0700 Quoting Octavio Alvarez (alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org): > > > > > I'd have expected someone to have QoS mentioned already, mainly to put > > > FTP and P2P traffic on the least important queues and don't hog up the > > > net. > > > > As long as there is no multicast entering the wlan this is best solved > > by getting more bandwidth. > > Well, we'll be on the *sending* end of the Hugo's, but... ;-) > > It would still be nice to multicast them inside our network (and out to > whomever wants to watch), but what the heck's the consumer-level client side > of multicast video streaming look like these days?
IIRC a number of IETF meetings were badly maimed in the wireless side until people remembered that the WLAN was no place for multicast video. VLC does mcast really nice. We're testing it for replacing antenna distribution systems and DVB-T receivers at work. -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 Mr and Mrs PED, can I borrow 26.7% of the RAYON TEXTILE production of the INDONESIAN archipelago?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
