On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:14:58 -0400, Andrew Sullivan said: > Despite my scepticism of the overall project, I find the above claim a > little hard to accept. RFC 2052, which defined SRV in an > experiment, came out in 1996. SRV was moved to the standards track in > 2000. I've never heard an argument why it won't work, and we know > that SRV records are sometimes in use. Why couldn't that mechanism be > used more widely?
My PS3 may want to talk to the world, but I have no control over Comcast's DNS.
pgprKXFEYZ1RQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
