> I'd wager what ARIN is going to do in said "Relying Party Agreement" > is tell RPs (i.e., *relying* parties) that they ought not rely to much > on the data for routing, and if they do and something gets hosed, > ARIN's not at fault -- but I'll wait to read the actual agreement > before speculating more.
that too is my *speculation*. which would be interesting, as accurate primary data is arin's primary responsibility. but anyone who has looked at any of the rirs' data seriously needed a strong stomach. randy
