This seems like an opportune time to remind people about RPKI-based origin validation as a hijack mitigation: <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-08> <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_bgp/configuration/15-2s/irg-origin-as.pdf>
I haven't run the numbers, but it seems like doing RPKI-based origin validation is probably a lot cheaper than upgrading routers to store a fully deaggregated route table :) On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddi...@gmail.com> wrote: > The thing to acknowledge is that you've realized it otherwise if you follow > the CIDR report than you will find bunch of arrogant folks/SPs not willing > to understand the dilemma they are causing through de-aggregation. > > Regards, > > Aftab A. Siddiqui > > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Anurag Bhatia <m...@anuragbhatia.com> wrote: > >> I didn't realized the routing table size problem with /24's. Stupid me. >> >> >> >> Thanks everyone for updates. Appreciate good answers. >> >>
