On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Eric Wieling wrote:
Is there a speedtest.net-like site you like?
The problems can be:
1. Finding one that gives consistent results, as others have already
noted.
2. Finding one that is topologically close to you. Me testing from my
office in Pittsburgh, PA to a server in Washington, DC isn't necessarily
an accurate test if I have to jump through 4-5 different ASs to reach it.
3. Path asymmetry can skew your test results. The path between you and
the test server is not necessarily (often isn't) the same as the path
from the test server back to you, and problems on the return path might
not be as readily visible to you, when you only have access to a full
suite of diagnostic tools at only one end.
Sometimes speed-test sites are fine for basic benchmarking, but I wouldn't
treat the results as gospel of rely on them alone to prove/disprove
whether a provider is delivering the bandwidth I contracted for.
jms
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:09 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Testing 1gbps bandwidth
On 14/08/2012 15:43, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
case trying to use one of the speedtest.net servers - we had a clear
10G path out through like 3 AS's in a row, the bottleneck was
speedtest.net's server. :)
you'll have to forgive me for being the cynical type, but I gave up on
Speedtest the day they reported 146Mbit/sec download over a link which was
hard-wired to 100Mbit/sec full duplex, and later that day they reported 2Mbit
from another nearby server to the same box. I figured a stddev of 2 orders of
magnitude wasn't going to give me figures accurate enough for my requirements.
But hey, this is the Internet: ymmv, ianal, lolwut, bbq.
Nick
