On 7/16/12, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > > Why would you want NAT66? ICK!!! One of the best benefits of IPv6 is being > able to eliminate NAT. NAT was a necessary evil for IPv4 address > conservation. It has no good use in IPv6.
NAT is good for getting the return traffic to the right firewall. How else do you deal with multiple firewalls & asymmetric routing? Yes, it's possible to get traffic back to the right place without NAT. But is it as easy as just NATing the outbound traffic at the firewall? Lee
