"We take responsibility for that lack of clarity, and we are taking steps
to make this right."
including firing the idiot responsible?
-Dan
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Cameron Byrne wrote:
In Cisco's defense, perhaps the legalese did not fully communicate the
intent of the service.
http://blogs.cisco.com/home/update-answering-our-customers-questions-about-cisco-connect-cloud-2/
CB
On Jul 5, 2012 8:52 AM, "Mario Eirea" <mei...@charterschoolit.com> wrote:
Has anyone seen this yet? Looks like Cisco was forcing people to join its
Cloud service through an update for it's consumer level routers.
http://www.neowin.net/news/cisco-locks-users-out-of-their-routers-requires-invasive-cloud-service
-Mario Eirea
