On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Douglas Otis <do...@mail-abuse.org> wrote: > The Internet should use more than port 80 and port 443. Is extending > entrenched TCP cruft really taking the Internet to a better and safer > place?
isn't the 'internet should use more than 80/443' really: "Some compelling use case should be found for more than 2 ports" ? Or perhaps more clearly: "What application is written that is getting wide appeal and uses more than 80/443?" (aside from edonkey which Arbor always shows as a huge user of bandwidth) -chris (btw, it would be nice to use more ports, if there are applications and users of said applications that want to do that...)
