> -----Original Message----- > From: Masataka Ohta [mailto:mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp] > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 2:12 PM > To: Templin, Fred L > Cc: Owen DeLong; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: IPv6 day and tunnels > > Templin, Fred L wrote: > > >> As I already said, 9KB is fine for me. > > > > Then you will agree that accommodation of MTU diversity > > is a MUST (my point). > > Not necessarily, as IPv4 can take care of itself and IPv6 > is hopeless.
IPv4 can take care of it how - with broken PMTUD or with broken fragmentation/reassembly? And, you won't get any argument from me that IPv6 has been stuck for years for good reasons - but MTU failures can soon be taken off the list. Fred fred.l.temp...@boeing.com