The only thing that I can really think of is that the BGP sessions do take up 
extra CPU time and memory on the routing engine, so there is an additional cost 
to the provider in terms of needing more routers and/or bigger routers if they 
have lots of customers speaking BGP to them that they may not have factored in 
to their standard pricing.

I guess there is also some extra cost in terms of NOC staff and systems to 
monitor the sessions as well as providing any troubleshooting etc. that they 
wouldn't have to do with "standard" customers that are statically routed.

Edward Dore 
Freethought Internet 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anurag Bhatia" <m...@anuragbhatia.com>
To: "NANOG Mailing List" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Friday, 25 May, 2012 5:01:11 PM
Subject: Industry practice for BGP costs - one time or fixed/monthly?

Hello everyone


I have been aggressively looking for deals in servers in Europe for
anycasting. One thing which surprises me is the "setup costs" for BGP. Few
providers quoted additional $50-100 which looks OK but a few of them quoted
as high as $150 *extra every month* just for having BGP (no full routing
table, but just default route pointing). Is there's any technical logic
behind such heavy costs? I mean at the end of day we are all talking at
layer 3 and thus it does not involves any hard connection/physical work.
What other members pay for BGP setup costs?



Thanks!

-- 

Anurag Bhatia
anuragbhatia.com
or simply - http://[2001:470:26:78f::5] if you are on IPv6 connected
network!

Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> |
Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>|
Google+ <https://plus.google.com/118280168625121532854>

Reply via email to