On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:42 PM, <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote: > On Thu, 03 May 2012 13:38:14 -0700, Greg Shepherd said: >> > Make sense? >> >> Sure, for v6. :) > > Does it make sense to be planning new deployments for anythign else? ;) > > (Hint - if your reaction is "but we're not v6-capable", who's fault is that?)
The original question was not from me. :) But even for IPv6 I would avoid embedded addressing and just use SSM. With SSM there's no need for embedded addressing and again you get all the security and network simplicity. FF3x::/96 Greg
