Most switches nowadays have dhcpv4 detection that can be enabled for port ranges. Not sure about v6.
-Grant On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Joel jaeggli <joe...@bogus.com> wrote: > On 4/17/12 01:37 , Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote: > > I don't understand why a problem with a tunnel 'leaves a bad taste with > > IPv6'. Since when a badly configured DNS zone left people with a 'bad > > taste for DNS', or a badly configured switch left people with 'a bad > > taste for spanning tree' or 'a bad taste for vlan trunking' ? > > > > It seems to me that what are perceived as operational mistakes and/or > > plain lack of knowledge for some technologies is perceived as a fault of > > the protocol itself in the case of IPv6. > > rogue dhcp servers are sufficiently common that tools had to be > developed to address their existence and they're still a nuisance after > all that. > > > People need to get their acts together. > > indeed. > >
