On 11 Apr 2012, at 02:34, "Owen DeLong" <o...@delong.com> wrote:. > >> Don't let the "mpls" keyword throw you off. This actually causes the >> box to run the inet /and/ mpls address families in packet mode. >> > > I'm not unfamiliar or uninitiated in this regard. I had tickets with Juniper > for > over a year and it escalated quite high up their escalation chain before they > finally admitted "Yeah, Services JunOS is different and it behaves differently > and if you need to do what you're trying to do, you should buy an M or MX > series." > > It's quite unfortunate. I'd really like for the SRX series to not be so > crippled for > my purposes.
Do you have an example of this crippledness? -- Leigh ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________
