Re Bill, wo...@pch.net (Bill Woodcock) wrote:
> > Well, let's say, using Quagga/BIRD might not really be best practice for > > everybody... (e.g., *we* are using Cisco equipment for this) > How does your Cisco know whether an adjacent nameserver is heavily loaded, > and adjust its BGP announcements accordingly? It doesn't have to. I don't know how you guys do it, but we take great care to keep min. 70% overhead capacity during standard operation. Elmar.
