On (2012-03-07 07:07 +0000), Leigh Porter wrote:

> What's the nicest way of allowing the ops servers all talk to each VPN 
> instance? At the moment I just us pretty normal L3VPN techniques so that 
> every VPN sees routes tagged with the ops VPN target community and so that 
> the ops VPN sees all the other VPN routes but the division between VPNs is 
> maintained.

You might want to peek at MPLS VPN Security book by Behringer for some
ideas[0].
But personally I'd do it by having RT for MGMT servers and different RT for
addresses needing centralized MGMT. So two special-use RTs.

The NMS network would export routes with this RT:Servers (only the servers
actually poking the VPN network, not everything)
And the customer VRFs would import this RT:Servers.

The customer VRFs would export (only the nodes actually needing NSM, not
whole network) routes with RT:CPEs.
And the NMS network would import RT:CPEs.

One way to do latter part is 
JunOS: set routing-instance FOO rib FOO.inet.0 static route CPE/32 
qualified-next-hop CPE interface xe-4/2/0.42 tag 2000
  IOS: ip route vrf FOO CPE 255.255.255.255 ten4/2/0.42 CPE tag 2000

And have policy which matches to 2000 and add RT:CPE.



Annoyingly in JunOS you cannot easily import more than one RT, I hope
they'll fix it so that you can do IOS style RT + policy imports. 
So in JunOS you almost certainly want chained import policy like
'vrf-import [ VRFOO-IMPORT VRF-MGMT-IMPORT ]' where VRFOO-IMPORT is just
'from community VRFFOO; then default-action accept' and VRF-MGMT-IMPORT is
'from community RT:Servers; then default-action accept'

[0] 
http://www.amazon.co.uk/MPLS-VPN-Security-Cisco-Press/dp/8177586998/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1331110165&sr=8-1
> 
> Or, would it be nicer to have the firewall have a foot in each VPN, advertise 
> routes to ops systems to each VPN instance and receive routes from all the 
> other VPNs?
> 
> -- 
> Leigh
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 

-- 
  ++ytti

Reply via email to