Why does everyone keep falling for the same address collector ? ;-) -- LoL
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 10:22:15AM -0600, Guru NANOG wrote: > Common Misconception: One additional bit of IPv4 Addressing will solve > world hunger > > The Evil Bit (or spare unused bit) can be used to store (restore) one bit > > The Left-Most bit of the 32-bit Source Address Field can be SET to > Zero no matter what the original value. The Evil bit can be set IFF > the Left-Most bit is **changed**. > > Setting the Left-Most bit to zero **folds** this table in half. > http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.txt > > Setting the Left-Most bit to ONE would move return traffic to the > upper half of the Spectrum which has vast quantities of unused /8s > > Wide-spread consensus shows that TWO bits can work. Three bits folds > the table to 1/8th. > Governments want a 4-bit Return Prefix to their Super-Hubs for > IPv6-like intercept. > > The U.S.FCC is expected to issue the regulations on how Spread > Spectrum Source Address Shaping will work in their licensed CPE > wireless devices. There are 160-bits > in the deprecated header so there are many ways to go. > > One-Way Broadcast IP Addressing is now available. The Source Address > Field is used > for the second half of the 64-bit Destination Address. The DF (Did > Flip) bit near the Evil > Bit is used to note the two halves of the Destination Address have > been *flipped*. > NANOGers simply route 32 and then 32 after the flip based only on the > Destination Field. > There is no Source Address, only a channel (port). > > Keywords: WRT DNSMASQ Tomato WIFI Linux CPE -- ;s =;