> -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Patti [mailto:t...@swalter.com] > Sent: 27 February 2012 02:42 > To: 'david raistrick'; 'Randy Carpenter' > Cc: 'Nanog' > Subject: RE: Reliable Cloud host ? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: david raistrick [mailto:dr...@icantclick.org] > > Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 7:19 PM > > To: Randy Carpenter > > Cc: Nanog > > Subject: Re: Reliable Cloud host ? > > > > On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Randy Carpenter wrote: > > > > > I don't need that kind of HA, and understand that it is not going > to > > > be available. 15 minutes of downtime is fine. 6 hours is completely > > > unacceptable, and it false advertising to say you have a "Cloud" > > > service, and then have the realization that you could have > > > *indefinite* downtime. > > > > Um. You and I apparently work in different clouds. > > Since it is the weekend, I can't resist writing down a little equation: > > Marketing(cloud) <> Technology(cloud) > > For some values of "cloud" perhaps?
Well indeed that is a valid point. All cloud to me means is that there is some abstracted instance of x and that it does not always relate to a particular physical device, indeed, it may well be spread around a few physical devices. I don't think there is any implied magic redundancy automatic failover move your instance to another bit of metal if something breaks in there unless that's specifically stated. caveat emptor -- Leigh ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________