> So, it is not OK for traffic to be /intentionally/ diverted through a > malevolent AS
traffic? i do not hold the fantasy that traffic is highly correlated to the control plane. see http://archive.psg.com/optometry.pdf if you need a disproof of the fantasy. > but it is OK for traffic to be /unintentionally/ diverted through a > (possibly) malevolent AS? intent? how the hell do i know intent? i can barely read my own mind let alone telstra's. and i very much doubt telstra thought they were _attacking_ optus. randy
