> You might want to give this a read: > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-redundancy-consider-02.txt
That doesn't really help us if we want to deploy before that draft becomes a standard. Are there any DHCPv6 servers currently that actually function in a fashion that is suitable for service providers? -Randy > -------- Original Message -------- > From: Randy Carpenter <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, Jan 17, 2012 5:4 PM > To: Nanog <[email protected]> > CC: > Subject: How are you doing DHCPv6 ? > > > I am wondering how people out there are using DHCPv6 to handle > assigning prefixes to end users. > > We have a requirement for it to be a redundant server that is > centrally located. DHCPv6 will be relayed from each customer access > segment. > > We have been looking at using ISC dhcpd, as that is what we use for > v4. However, it currently does not support any redundancy. It also > does not do very much useful logging for DHCPv6 requests. Certainly > not enough to keep track of users and devices. > > So, my questions are: > > > How are you doing DHCPv6 with Prefix Delegation? > > What software are you using? > > > When DHCPv6 with Prefix Delegation seems to be about the only way to > deploy IPv6 to end users in a generic device-agnostic fashion, I am > wondering why it is so difficult to find a working solution. > > thanks, > -Randy > > -- > | Randy Carpenter > | Vice President - IT Services > | Red Hat Certified Engineer > | First Network Group, Inc. > | (800)578-6381, Opt. 1 > ---- > > > >
