On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:32:46 EST, Ray Soucy said: > 2011/12/26 Masataka Ohta <[email protected]>: > > And, if RA is obsoleted, which is a point of discussion, there > > is no reason to keep so bloated ND only for address resolution.
> By who? Sources please. > A few people on NANOG complaining about RA is pretty far from deprecation of > RA. Especially when some of the biggest IPv6 networks out there are still using it pretty heavily. (C''mon you guys, *deploy* already. It's pretty sad when people are arguing about stuff like this, and a frikkin' cow college out in the boonies pushing 300-400mbits/sec of IPv6 off-campus is still a "large" deployment. It's embarassing for the industry as a whole)
pgp6FAhdIIwNI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
