On 12/6/11 00:50 , Florian Weimer wrote: > * Alex Le Heux: > >> The RIPE NCC is aware that 128.0.0.0/16 is configured as a martian by >> default in (some) Juniper OS, even though RFC 5735 and RFC3330 outline >> that this /16 should no longer be reserved as specialised address >> space. > > Would someone please clarify the impact? Will it result in a blackhole, > or will the entire announcement be suppressed? I suspect the latter, > given what we see and what Chris Adams has reported.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.2/topics/usage-guidelines/routing-configuring-martian-addresses.html
