On 11/29/11 09:30 , Owen DeLong wrote: > I believe those have been obsoleted, but, /64 remains the best choice, IMHO.
operational practice has moved on. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6164 > Owen > > On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:00 AM, McCall, Gabriel wrote: > >> Note that /127 is strongly discouraged in RFC5375 and RFC3627. 3627 suggests >> using /112 for router links, or /126 at the very most. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Fred Baker [mailto:f...@cisco.com] >> ... >> I see no reason you couldn't use a /127 prefix if the link was point to >> point. >> ... >> > > >
