I'm assuming colo means hosting, and the OP misspoke. Most colo providers don't provide active network for colo (as in power and rack only) customers.
2011/10/25 Paul Graydon <p...@paulgraydon.co.uk> > On 10/25/2011 08:43 AM, Christopher Pilkington wrote: > >> Is it common in the industry for a colocation provider, when requested to >> put an egress ACL facing us such as: >> >> deny udp any a.b.c.d/24 eq 80 >> >> …to refuse and tell us we must subscribe to their managed DDOS product? >> >> -cjp >> >> >> For colo? No, filtering is the customers concern, unless failure to do > so is causing a problem for the colo network. Such services are almost > always paid for add-ons to a colo package. The colocation business is > usually fairly low on the profit margin with most companies trying to get > away with the bare minimum possible over and above the basics. > > >
