Protection against learning a bad default route through whatever routing protocol they are learning, since these two routes would be more specific than any typical default route. They probably got burned learning a default route.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Glen Kent <glen.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have seen a few operators adding static routes like: > 0.0.0.0/1 some next-hop and > 128.0.0.0/1 some next-hop. > > Why would anyone want to add such static routes? What does 0.0.0.0/1 > mean. Note that the netmask is 1 and not 0. > > Thanks, > Glen >
