Pim Van,
i am just looking for a alternative way.
i don't need this stupid SixXs at all anymore.
also, Pim, are you Pim for Multicast? no IGMP? :D
:)
Thank you
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pim van Pelt" <p...@ipng.nl>
To: "Meftah Tayeb" <tayeb.mef...@gmail.com>
Cc: <ipv6-...@lists.cluenet.de>; <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: Open Letters to Sixxs
Hoi,
Meftah perhaps you mailed the wrong people -- you seem to be
specifically addressing SixXS, but you mailed nanog@nanog.org and
ipv6-...@lists.cluenet.de, both of which may not be able to
authoritatively answer your questions.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Meftah Tayeb <tayeb.mef...@gmail.com>
wrote:
why SIXXS is very strict like that ?
I suppose it's up to SixXS to define their policy (one account per
person comes to mind *) and revise it if they see a need. They are
free to accept or reject any user and I do not believe they have an
obligation to serve any given user (ie access is a privilege not a
right), and I think they have a right to ask for information just as
much as users have a right to not use their service if they believe
the amount of information SixXS wants to know about them and their
intended use is too much. In general I think they are rather
transparent about rejection reasons, in your case likely because you
neglected to heed the FAQ item on one account per person.
I'm not sure bringing this up in the scope of nanog or ipv6-ops is
productive. It's not clear to me, except for your plethora of
questions, what you are trying to accomplish.
I'm sorry you feel that SixXS is not the right place for you. Luckily
there's plenty of choice in high quality tunnelbrokers, as others in
this thread have pointed out.
groet,
Pim
*) http://www.sixxs.net/faq/account/?faq=oneaccount
--
Pim van Pelt <p...@ipng.nl>
PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/
__________ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la
base des signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __________
Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la base des
signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __________
Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
