-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 08/14/2011 17:43, Tim Wilde wrote:
> On a serious note, though, really, what DOES it say about the real-world
> maturity / actual chances of adoption for IPv6 that Charles' statement
> above is, in fact, true?
Someone else has already pointed out the relationship of IPv6 now to
IPv4 20 years ago, but at the risk of flogging the horse what I get from
this is that what we're suffering from is a lack of operational
experience, combined with the fact that a significant percentage of the
early adopters have at least one toe in the "zealot" pool. :)
It's also worth pointing out that even today in IPv4 TI(still)MTOWTDI.
Witness the recent IS-IS vs. OSPF thread; or any of the other recurring
IPv4-only topics. If you think about it, this is a feature. If there was
only one right answer the world-wide market for network engineers would
be a lot smaller than it is now.
Doug
- --
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOStUcAAoJEFzGhvEaGryExSoH/2kPPpcR7zTi+HsyYsZ5xbIP
8G3g5/rfi8WAbhNjEzOY+vr+5vQwC02KNxgNdpmemrXEahgq9Na8I8rxT7+GjjUw
atZx7Fx6k3uvmdubWOCRn0G0CQ36eq7QHEt4jS2SkzDzC0TF7aWiw8MNxd6FbLv3
Bb7zs/eKut9uO32W+TpWMv2AbN46G6Xjt3lWzWwTzWSuM3MK8FaMR52ZyssLJxnG
LfyLGDRUgER2Q7uNvxIeqaGsX87qtpM2SZb7c0kVfxqUnM7vSLcvSHOpuI2R39AJ
BkBS+ViDbg30tdhNtC03Brmk6uHBEhLf+aH+1+4b2i3GfS1iG0nNHJP2Lf4Ud5M=
=9PGM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
