This is one of the reasons that I thought a useful output from the opsec or idr working group would be a documented set of community functions. Not mapped to values mind you. but I really like to say to providers "do you support rfc blah communities" or "what's your rfc blah community mapping" rather than "what communities do you support".
On Aug 7, 2011, at 8:39 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > On Sun, 07 Aug 2011 08:53:05 CDT, Graham Wooden said: >> I should also note that Centurylink has been less than cooperative on even >> thinking about changing my routes to a pref of 70 on our behalf (they don't >> accept communities). I think time to get the account rep involved ... > > "they don't accept communities"??!? Just... wow. ;) > > (That's if they flat out don't support it - there's a separate ring of Hell > reserved for the ones who do support it but forget to document the part > about singing the Zimbabwe national anthem backwards while standing on > your head...)
