On Aug 4, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Owen DeLong" <o...@delong.com> > >> On Aug 4, 2011, at 8:35 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: >> >>>> - Generic consumer grade NAT/Firewall >>> >>> Hobby horse: please make sure it support bridge mode? Those of us who >>> want to put our own routers on the wire will hate you otherwise. >> >> Why? As long as it can be a transparent router, why would it need to >> be a bridge? > > Ask a Verizon FiOS customer who wants to run IPv4 VPNs. > > He didn't say IPv6 only, right? > > I have a couple of customers who can't get bridge mode on residence FiOS > service, and therefore can't run their own routers to terminate IPsec. > If they could get routed static IPv4 rather than bridge, why wouldn't they be able to terminate IPSec VPNs? Note I did say TRANSPARENT router. That would mean no NAT and routed static IPv4.
Owen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
