http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gashinsky-v6nd-enhance-00
Sent from my iThing On Jul 14, 2011, at 10:57 PM, Fernando Gont <ferna...@gont.com.ar> wrote: > On 07/14/2011 11:35 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > >>> Well, unless there's some layer-2 anti-spoofing mitigation in >>> place, with /64 subnets the "local attacker" typically *will* have >>> enough addresses. >> >> Solving a local attack > > Well, I was talking about not *introducing* ;-) one. > > >> is something I consider different in scope >> than the current draft being discussed in 6man, v6ops, ipv6@ etc... > > Which I-D are you referring to? > > Thanks, > -- > Fernando Gont > e-mail: ferna...@gont.com.ar || fg...@acm.org > PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1 > >
