> I also view RFC6296 as a perpetuation of the clear violation of the > end-to-end principle (i.e., ' . . . functions placed at low levels of > a system may be redundant or of little value when compared with the > cost of providing them at that low level . . .') embodied in the > abomination of NAT/PAT into IPv6, and the consequent instantiation of > yet more unnecessary and harmful state into networks which are already > deep in the throes of autogenic thromboembolism.
great rant. not to quibble but i thought 6296 was stateless. randy
