My thoughts are that we need either a week or a 36-48 hour period. I thought this before the events of last week.
I am very happy with the results and that based on the public statements so far (Looking forward to hearing what is presented at NANOG on this as well) that it was viewed as "didn't break much" by the major players. This affirms to me what we've observed for many years. Having IPv6 enabled doesn't break "much", and not in a way that is any more broken by the issues you can observe in networks otherwise. - Jared On Jun 10, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Bill Stewart wrote: > So should monthly IPv6 day be the same week as Microsoft Patch Tuesday? :-)
