My guess would be that someone didn't get the memo about the use agreement
ending since they apparently still were listed in whois.

Just a thought. Might have been a legitimate mistake from a position of 
ignorance,
not knowing that they weren't still the registered resource holder.

Owen

On May 13, 2011, at 2:22 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

> 
> their use agreement ended in 2008.  telling the nanog world they are going to 
> reuse it
> three years later is not exactly what most would consider prior notice to the 
> registered
> holder that they would like to do a research project wiht resources that are 
> not registered
> to them.
> 
> /bill
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:02:55PM -0400, Greg Whynott wrote:
>> On May 12, 2011, at 6:30 AM, <bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com> 
>> <bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> erb
>>> d I would appreciate it if they
>>> would at least notify me ahead of time if they want to futz around
>>> with prefixes that are not registered to them.
>> 
>> 
>> erb
>> 
>> helps to read before you jump!
>> 
>> -g
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged 
>> information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or 
>> distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally 
>> intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
>> please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or 
>> other information contained in this message may not be that of the 
>> organization.


Reply via email to