On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:16 AM, William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Courts like precedent. I choose Facebook's precedent. Seems reasonable to >> me. >> > That's also roughly in line with Nextel and others for CALEA. Hrm, I had thought that CALEA specifically removed the ability of the Provider to charge for the 'service'? Though there is always the case where the Provider can say: "Yes, this doesn't fall into the CALEA relevant requests, we can do this for you though it will cost time/materials to do, here's our schedule..." or that's the stance a previous employer was taking... (at the direction of their lawyer-catzen)
