> -----Original Message----- > From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us] > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 12:52 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: IPv6 Prefix announcing > > On 4/26/2011 09:39, Kate Gerry wrote: > > Funny enough, some carriers actually require the 'smallest' as being /32... > > :( > > > > This is becoming the exception now, not the rule. > > Last year I was fighting with Verizon about their refusal to carry /48s. > That, together with the impasse of figuring out how to put dual stack > IPv6 on an Ethernet port (it was delivered as IPv4 only multiple times), > I never accepted it and went with a competitor who got it right the > first time. However, I've had several sources tell me Verizon has since > backpedaled and now accepts /48s. > > ~Seth
*> 2001:67C:120::/48 2001:504:16::1B1B 150 0 6939 701 12702 43751 6716 i Mike
