John, On Apr 19, 2011, at 9:36 AM, John Curran wrote: >> There are already two "address registrars" and at least 5 (6 if you count >> IANA) address whois databases. I expect there to be more in the future, >> particularly now there is an existence proof that you can sell addresses and >> the Internet doesn't explode. > How does transfer of number resources within a region imply additional whois > databases?
Hint: Add % whois -h whois.depository.net 128.8.10.5 to the list I provided you in the previous message. Or are you implying that ARIN and the other RIRs are committing to synchronizing their databases with alternative address registrars as they become established? >> What venue do you propose for a global consultative action to be taken in an >> open, transparent, an unbiased manner? > I've suggested ICANN, IGF, or the RIRs... I find ARIN's new found interests in engaging in ICANN-related processes heartwarming given my past experiences, but I suspect both the ICANN and RIR venues would be somewhat biased against changing the status quo. As for the IGF, my perhaps mistaken perception is that it has a slightly different focus than dealing with the operational implications of the proliferation of alternative address registrars. The main problem is one of timeliness. I doubt the market is going to wait for IGF, ICANN, or even RIR processes. But we'll see. Regards, -drc
