>Suppose, just for the sake of the argument, that a statute or >precedent came about to the effect that a community which permits >access to .xxx sites (by not censoring the DNS) implicitly accepts >"that kind of thing" isn't obscenity under local law.
If we're doing counterfactuals, let's suppose that everyone in the world thinks that .XXX is a great idea, and ICANN runs itself efficiently on a budget of $1M/yr. R's, John
