On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:32 -0500, John Curran wrote: > On Mar 9, 2011, at 12:43 AM, Majdi S. Abbas wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 12:44:05PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > >> i am more of a pessimist. i suspect that there will be enough v4-only > >> destinations out there that multi-homed enterprises fronting onto > >> dual-stack backbones will announce teenie bits of v4 so they can nat64. > > > > I'll take this one a little further. > > > > I suspect that as we reach exhaustion, more people will be > > forced to break space out of their provider's v4 aggregates, and > > announce them, and an unfiltered DFZ may well approach the 'million' > > entries some vendors now claim to support. > > This matches my personal view (and could be viewed as > "success" compared to the 5M estimate of Mr. Herrin...) > > /John
Are people going to be relying on using default-routing then in the future if they don't upgrade routers to handle large routing table growth? Or perhaps forgo dual-stack and have a separate physical IPv6 BGP network from IPv4? Are there any other strategies?
