> :: a real use for the diffserv bits! why not flowlabel in 6? it's been > :: looking for a use for a decade. > > Honestly, we figured flowlabel might actually find a use before all the > values of diffserv will :) In all seriousness, we are starting to set the > spec for v6 l3dsr now, so, if you care, and believe that flowlabel would > be a better field to "hijack" (or have a suggestion for another, better > way then same DSCP methodology that we used for ipv4), we welcome input..
well, compared to an extension header, it wins hands down. randy
