In message <5a6d953473350c4b9995546afe9939ee0bc13...@rwc-ex1.corp.seven.com>, " George Bonser" writes: > > Cost's might be lower but service will be worse. NAT breaks a lot of > > applications file sharing will not work properly and running your own > > web server at home will not work properly. Well you always get what > you > > pay for and people will buy any crap if it is cheap enough. > >=20 > > Jens > > While that is true, it is no worse than the situation right now. In the > US, the vast majority of users are already behind a NAT (I would say > over 90% of them are) so they are already experiencing this breakage. =20
But for the most part they can work around breakages with a single NAT. Double NAT prevents most of the work arounds working. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
