On 9 feb 2011, at 21:23, George Bonser wrote: > While that is true, it is no worse than the situation right now. In the > US, the vast majority of users are already behind a NAT (I would say > over 90% of them are) so they are already experiencing this breakage.
There's a big difference between being able to have uPNP IGD or NAT-PMP open up holes in the NAT (or do it manually) and being 100% incapable of getting any and all incoming sessions. And between having 64k ports for a home and having 64k ports for 100, 1000, 10000 ? homes.
