In message <WQE8G0a2F$snf...@perry.co.uk>, Roland Perry writes: > In article <20110204000954.a64c79a9...@drugs.dv.isc.org>, Mark Andrews > <ma...@isc.org> writes > >> These are just my straw poll of what may be difficult for small > >> enterprises in a change to IPv6. > > > >It isn't "change to", its "add IPv6". > > > >I expect to see IPv4 used for years inside homes and enterprises > >where there is enough IPv4 addresses to meet the internal needs. > >It's external communication which needs to switch to IPv6. Internal > >communication just comes along for the ride. > > If people start supplying CPE that are running IPv6 on the outside and > IPv4 NAT in the inside, then that would just fine, in the sense that the > users (in this case including the self-administrators of these small > enterprise networks) won't notice the difference. > -- > Roland Perry
They exist are starting to exist and the feature sets keep expanding. I just wish that all vendors would stop shipping IPv4 only equipement. For example the D-LINK DIR-615 does just about everything upsteam except SLAAC which you want if you want to insert it into the middle of your network and not at the border. I havn't explictly asked D-LINK about SLAAC upstream but I couldn't find it in the manual. Newer firmware I believe does PD (again not in the manuals on the web). D-LINK claim they have routers that do 6rd. The DIR-615 is priced within a home budget but at the upper end. I was looking to buy one for home. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org