-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Martin Millnert <milln...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Essentially, I'm not seeing the upside in assuming any state will > always be good, forever and always. And it boils down to what's been > discussed earlier: centralizing control of the Internet, whether > political or technical, makes it less robust to failures and more > prone to abuse/attack, as the value of a single point or target > increases. > In this, we completely agree. And as an aside, governments will always believe that that they can control the flow of information, when push comes to shove. This has always been a hazard, and will always continue to be so. As technologists, we need to be cognizant of that fact. - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003) wj8DBQFNS57lq1pz9mNUZTMRAlnAAKDoz15jmBf/N54958iUDbysbDPWkwCgx42x TAOZkWP+Dq0aOe7qzOB8WvQ= =rEH0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawgster(at)gmail.com ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
